Speaking Regionally

In my speech class last week, we had a discussion about differences in regional speech. I knew that different regions of the United States have different accents but I never realized to what extent we have the same name for different objects or a different name for the same object. For a visual on this post I wanted a dialect map, and I found a whole article of them on the Huffington Post’s site. dialect map

This dialect map shows that largely, we pronounce Mary, marry and merry the same. I was surprised that this was even a map at all; I always just assumed they were homophones, yet if you live in a limited region on the East Coast you pronounce a variation of the Mary/marry/merry differently. How do they pronounce it differently there? And why does their pronunciation differ from their neighbors?

Neighborly word disputes happen a lot here along the border of Wisconsin and Minnesota. Because the campus is so close to Minnesota, the student population is fairly half and half with each state. We are now in environments where we may mean the same thing but are saying something else and leading to a lot of confusion. For whatever reason most Minnesotans say hot dish instead of Wisconsinites casserole. To my way of thinking as a Wisconsinite a hot dish is something you put a casserole in, not something you eat. But to my Minnesotan friends, calling it a casserole is just wrong. Even within Wisconsin the whole bubbler, water fountain, drinking fountain  debate is a hot one. Here’s a map for that…

dialect map

As you can see about half of Wisconsin calls it a bubbler while the other half tends toward water fountain. I can’t begin to answer this question, but it is very curious to me the trends in this map. The West Coast largely calls it a drinking fountain, the East Coast goes by water fountain and the Midwest is somewhat mixed up in the middle. There are a few oddities like the east side of Massachusetts that say bubbler and the state of Michigan being surrounded by people calling it a water fountain. The Kohler company of eastern Wisconsin marketed it as a bubbler and that may be why people of eastern Wisconsin largely refer to it as a bubbler. With the bubbler, drinking/water fountain debate, if anyone says any of these three terms we all know they mean the same thing. Here’s a term I was surprised to learn differed so much by region…

dialect map

If you are at a restaurant in the green region and the waiter comes to ask for your beverage they will ask “Would you like a coke?” If you say yes, they will say “What kind of coke would you like?”The actual Coca-Cola drink was first manufactured in that region so maybe they say coke as the soda or pop because that is their way of advertising coke is the staple sweetened carbonated beverage. The rest of the country seems to be evenly divided amongst people who call it soda and people who call it pop. And once again, Wisconsin is split in half. This map also seems to have less of a pattern: instead of the east coast being the opposite of the west coast this time they are both the same. The Northwest coast down to the Midwest calls it pop, and then there is that one random blob of people saying soda in the middle of Illinois and Missouri.

I attached the link to the article I discussed if you are interested in looking at that. For me, I’m curious what you think. Other than the reasons I touched on, what do you think might contribute to these differences in word choice? Thanks for reading, and I look forward to your thoughts.

Huffington Post Article

But Disney Told Me So

Disney is frequently credited with ruining people’s love lives. Though I don’t have a lot of experience in romantic  love, each of us are surrounded by other kinds of relationships  in our every day lives. And I believe that Disney should be credited for helping kids understand important values  instead of focusing on the down side of Disney love so much.

Let’s start with the most targeted of the Disney movies: the princesses. Sure, most of them find love for the first time with their prince charming and that is definitely not realistic. But let’s not forget that a lot can be learned from the variety of Disney princesses my generation grew up with. Jasmine and Belle remind us not to judge a book by its cover: Jasmine as she falls in love with Aladdin because of his true personality, and Belle refusing to be turned away from the beastly exterior of her captor. Mulan teaches us about being yourself as she finds her bravery and comes to terms with not being the deemed perfect woman of that time. Both Pocahontas and Mulan represent standing up for what you believe in is the best course of action, even in the face of adversity. Cinderella shows us perseverance in hard tasks we face in life as well as chasing our dreams. Ariel teaches us to actively chase our dreams. It is up to interpretation if she chases it in a good way, but she shows us the extent one goes to for someone they truly love. Snow White and Sleeping Beauty can talk to animals and the main lesson I can think of there is environmental kindness, sorry didn’t watch either of those much. Though it can accurately be said that the Disney princesses show us love in an unrealistic way, most movies do. Let’s not forget the valuable lessons the Disney princesses taught without me even feeling like I was learning (more on that later).

From my favorite childhood film Winnie the Pooh I learned many things. The gang from the Hundred Acre Wood sticks together through everything and in my opinion, A.A. Milne sculpted the best model for instant and lasting friendship out of any of the Disney movies. When Pooh eats too much honey at Rabbit’s house and is stuck in the front entrance for a few days Christopher Robin orders that he not eat until he can move from the rabbit hole. Though this would be hard to carry out, Pooh’s friends stop by and keep his mind off the need for honey. My favorite thing about the friendships in Winnie the Pooh is that there is never any doubt about the friendship: the inhabitants of the Hundred Acre Wood teach us unconditional love. Pooh never questions his love for Christopher Robin, Piglet or any of the others. Of course Rabbit gets annoyed with Tigger for bouncing in his garden, but their friendship is evident despite this irritation. With a lot of the friendships I have had throughout the years, there have been times I doubt whether this person is really my friend and if they really like me. Pooh,  teach us to trust your friends, and likewise create friendships with people you can trust. Each of the characters with their different quirks teach us that being different can bring about the best in a group relationship. In Pooh’s Grand Adventure the Search for Christopher Robin, Christopher Robin tells Pooh to always remember: “You are braver than you believe, stronger than you seem, and smarter than you think.” Throughout the movie Pooh helps his friends overcome their doubts about their different skills to perform certain tasks using this saying though he can’t ever seem to quite remember it. Through this quote we are taught not to doubt ourselves but to believe that we are capable of great things. Pooh made me laugh when I was in any kind of mood, made me cry when he sang the wherever you are song in the Grand Adventure movie, made me cuddle up with my Mom when I was wanted to be grown up and when I wanted to stop.

Childhood was brought to me with many great movies, and one that I felt certain I could not leave out was the Toy Story series. I firmly believed that my stuffed animals could hear me and felt loved when I cuddled with them. After my first viewing when all I beheld was the awesomeness of talking toys in a movie, I started to know the characters better. I realized Woody’s jealousy of Buzz got in the way of their friendship which ended up being a great one. In the second movie I understood that bad things happen and we can react to them in different ways: Jessie by embracing the moments she had out of the box, the Prospector by plotting to ruin the other toy’s happiness. The age difference between the first two movies and the third was quite a gap so my understanding was different. When I watched the third movie, I understood the lesson as I watched it, not receiving the message subconsciously as I had in my childhood. The main thing I got from the third movie was that if you love someone, let them be happy. Toy Story taught me that first impressions- though important- may not be accurate in picking friends. I learned that you go on dangerous missions to rescue a friend as Buzz, Potato Head and the rest search for Woody. I learned that change hurts but that doesn’t mean it’s bad.

I want to be clear here. My parents are amazing and they have instilled good values in me from a young age. But young children don’t learn through words as much as they do through actions. An action speaks 1,000 words is probably the most true for kids. Watching the princesses, Pooh, and Toy Story, kids are exposed to those good values without realizing it. They couldn’t explain like I did in this post what Disney taught them, but they watched good actions and are exposed to good values. Disney taught me the valuable lessons of the princesses, Winnie the Pooh, Toy Story, and many others. Today’s kids have a great exposure from Disney. Not only are there what I think of as the classics from my childhood to love and learn from, there are movies like Up, Tangled, and Cars that serve to remind us of the lessons from early Disney and bring us new ones. Disney movies are not realistic in their description of falling in love. Who wants them to be realistic? Don’t we from a young age, hope for that happily ever after that we know is not an easy thing to come by? Much of what the movies do are unrealistic- for example objects/animals that can’t talk talking. I don’t know about you, but that is why I love Disney. Their movies taught me in the comfort of my living room, without any effort on my part.

Go get your dream, and if it doesn’t turn out exactly the way you dreamed it that’s good. Dreams are too perfect to be true. Just realize, reality can be pretty amazing too.

Dear Abby

A newspaper would not be a newspaper without a Dear Abby column or something that serves a similar purpose under a different name. Why do so many people look to Abby for help? How could a complete stranger be someone we want to share our problems with?

The original Dear Abby column was begun by Pauline Phillips who wrote under the pen name Abigail Van Buren, which she chose as a combination of the name Abigail from the Bible and president Van Buren. She began writing the column in 1956 and continued until 2000 when she passed it on to her daughter Jeanne Phillips who continues the column today. Her twin sister also had her own column that served a similar purpose. Today many columns have sparked from the original Dear Abby and are written by a variety of different people.

What is it about Abby that draws so many people in? I have always felt more comfortable seeking advice from people close to me and that I know well, so to me it seems uncomfortable to air personal complaints to a large viewing audience. Though it is anonymous and signed with a tag line describing the writer’s problem I would not like my problems to become a tabloid for the local newspaper. Yet for reasons I cannot put my finger on, generations have appealed to Abby with problems as personal as marital disputes and apparently a ten year old wishing for a pet monkey.